Taro Yamane vs Krejcie & Morgan vs Cochran vs G*Power: Which Sample-Size Method?
"How many respondents do I need?" trips up many Master's students because there are so many formulas to choose from. Here is a 5-minute summary of the four most popular methods and how to pick one.
Overview of the four methods
| Method | Use when | You need | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Yamane | Population is known | N, e | Simple, adjustable e |
| Krejcie & Morgan | Population is known | N (read table) | Fast, no calculation |
| Cochran | Large/unknown population | p, q, e, Z | Flexible, infinite population |
| G*Power | Advanced stats (regression, SEM) | Power, effect size, α | Highest statistical rigor |
1. Taro Yamane (1967)
Best when you know the exact population and use descriptive or basic tests. Formula: n = N / (1 + Ne²). Its weakness is ignoring statistical power, so it is losing acceptance for complex designs.
2. Krejcie & Morgan (1970)
Uses similar statistical logic but delivered as a ready-made table at 95% confidence. Just look up your population N and read off the required n.
3. Cochran (1977)
The most flexible when the population is unknown or very large, using proportion (p, q), confidence level (Z), and margin of error (e), with a finite-population correction available.
4. G*Power (today's standard)
If your study uses multiple regression or SEM, this is the standard leading universities require, because it is computed from statistical power, effect size (f²), and significance level (α).
So which should you choose?
- Survey research, known population → Taro Yamane or Krejcie & Morgan
- Unknown / very large population → Cochran
- Regression, path analysis, SEM → G*Power